Faith and Films "The Social Network"

True Connection or False Validation is The Social Network's Question

DVD Release Date:  January 11, 2011
Theatrical Release Date:  October 1, 2010
Rating:  PG-13 (for sexual content, drug and alcohol use, and strong language)
Genre:  Drama
Run Time:  120 min.
Director:  David Fincher
Cast:  Jesse Eisenberg, Andrew Garfield, Justin Timberlake, Armie Hammer, Max Minghella, Rooney Mara, Joseph Mazzello



Last night Lily and I watched "Social Network". It was an interesting movie for me because I am a huge fan of Facebook and the networking it brings. Here are some thoughts I had on the movie.

Facebook  is a searing examination of the world's biggest social media Web site. To date, The Social Network is the most important film about American culture in the twenty-first century. 

Not that it's overtly about that.  On the surface, this is an exposé of Facebook's formation and its Ivy League founder Mark Zuckerberg.  Beneath the surface, what drives Zuckerberg—i.e. the need to define himself to the world—isn't too far removed from what drives millions of people to update their Facebook status ten times a day (or Twitter account—Facebook's obnoxiously-needy little brother). 

The parallel is clear (if not stated) and perceptive in disturbing ways.  Every status update is more than informational; it's defining.  It's about class and status, about being liked and affirmed and cheered and, well, "friended."  What are the implications of (and revelations found in) the need to post every precious thought that crosses our minds? The Social Network isn't just about Zuckerberg's narcissism; it's about ours.

To be fair, it's hard to discern how much of this scandalous retelling is actually true, and we should respect that personal reputations are on the line.  Still, fidelity to facts becomes moot as the fable told here unveils broader truths about our core impulses—individually and collectively—in ways that should, quite frankly, cause millions to reflect on their own motives and obsessions.  It's not so much a biography as it's "The Morality Tale of Our Times."

Based on Ben Mezrich's best-seller The Accidental Billionaires, The Social Network depicts a more debaucherous and cutthroat origin than one would ever expect.  What began innocently enough as a way to help Harvard students connect online steadily ballooned into a media empire—and at a rate that Zuckerberg couldn't handle, at least not morally.

Yes, he's a genius.  A computer-programming whiz with deft instincts about what people would respond to, Zuckerberg was born to birth this revolution.  But a cocktail of arrogance and insecurities sabotaged his working relationships—and friendships—until, billions of dollars later, Zuckerberg was sued by the people he burned.

That legal action is intercut throughout, providing context to events as they unfold at a blistering, exhilarating pace.  Zuckerberg—equal parts elitist and geek (and the worst sides of both)—takes advantage of the naïve while disposing of partners when they don't tow his line, and does so in a way that no one sees coming.

It's a trail highlighted by parties and littered with groupies; excess that grows with success (which gets a little redundant I must say)  Yet while Zuckerberg's crew is seduced by immoral trappings, the film's tone—from dark atmospheres to Trent Reznor's unnerving score—paints it as a destructive slippery slope.  (One soundtrack cue title defines it best: "The Gentle Hum of Anxiety.")

Facebook isn't just about the need to connect (though it is that), but more so the compulsion to control your identity; to create the best version of You.  It's how you want to be perceived; an illusion of who you fully are.  Many will walk away from this film judging Zuckerberg; instead, even if not guilty of the same sins, they should be chilled to the bone by recognizing the same impulses. 

Using Zuckerberg's compromised ascent to the "status" of Youngest Billionaire Ever as a parable, The Social Network asks a broader question of us about the Web site he founded: does Facebook offer true connection or false validation?  The answer lies, as with all things, not in the amoral device being used but rather in the souls that use it.




Here is what to look out for (Thanks to IMDb)

CAUTIONS:

• Drugs/Alcohol Content:  Party scenes where alcohol (both as drinks and shots) are consumed, as are drugs (from bongs to lines of coke).  More benign drinking occurs in bars.
• Language/Profanity:  Though not pervasive, most profanities are used—including one f-word.  Others include the usual suspects: a few variations of the a-word, b-word, and s-word, as well as a couple uses of the Lord's name in vain.   A lewd word for male genitals.
• Sexual Content/Nudity:  No nudity, but women strip down to their underwear at parties.  Two couples go to bathroom stalls, begin to strip, and then from outside the stalls sex is briefly heard/assumed.  Oral sex is implied off-frame but not literally seen.  Conversations that include discussions of sex and sexual dialogue.  Provocative dancing, kissing, and making out at parties, close physical intimacy.  A woman gets out of bed in her underwear.
• Violence/Other:  One person flips both middle fingers at someone. 
  
  
  It is a good watch. It's interesting and well acted. But I wasn't too impressed with the Content of the movie. 
  My Rating B-